Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(7): 609-620, 2023 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258655

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause serious lower respiratory tract disease in older adults, but no licensed RSV vaccine currently exists. An adenovirus serotype 26 RSV vector encoding a prefusion F (preF) protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) in combination with RSV preF protein was previously shown to elicit humoral and cellular immunogenicity. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b, proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of an Ad26.RSV.preF-RSV preF protein vaccine. Adults who were 65 years of age or older were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive vaccine or placebo. The primary end point was the first occurrence of RSV-mediated lower respiratory tract disease that met one of three case definitions: three or more symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (definition 1), two or more symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (definition 2), and either two or more symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection or one or more symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection plus at least one systemic symptom (definition 3). RESULTS: Overall, 5782 participants were enrolled and received an injection. RSV-mediated lower respiratory tract disease meeting case definitions 1, 2, and 3 occurred in 6, 10, and 13 vaccine recipients and in 30, 40, and 43 placebo recipients, respectively. Vaccine efficacy was 80.0% (94.2% confidence interval [CI], 52.2 to 92.9), 75.0% (94.2% CI, 50.1 to 88.5), and 69.8% (94.2% CI, 43.7 to 84.7) for case definitions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After vaccination, RSV A2 neutralizing antibody titers increased by a factor of 12.1 from baseline to day 15, a finding consistent with other immunogenicity measures. Percentages of participants with solicited local and systemic adverse events were higher in the vaccine group than in the placebo group (local, 37.9% vs. 8.4%; systemic, 41.4% vs. 16.4%); most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the vaccine group and the placebo group (4.6% and 4.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In adults 65 years of age or older, Ad26.RSV.preF-RSV preF protein vaccine was immunogenic and prevented RSV-mediated lower respiratory tract disease. (Funded by Janssen Vaccines and Prevention; CYPRESS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03982199.).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Anciano , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Método Doble Ciego , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/sangre , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/uso terapéutico , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/sangre , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Innovation in aging ; 5(Suppl 1):1050-1051, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1600580

RESUMEN

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) may cause serious lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in older adults, and there is currently no licensed vaccine. CYPRESS (NCT03982199) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b proof-of-concept trial of an Ad26.RSV.preF-based vaccine for the prevention of RSV-mediated LRTD in older adults. Adults aged ≥65 years were randomized 1:1 before the RSV season to receive Ad26.RSV.preF-based vaccine or placebo. Acute respiratory infection symptoms were collected through a patient eDiary and/or clinician assessment until the end of the RSV season. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of RTPCR-confirmed RSV-mediated LRTD according to any of 3 case definitions: (1) ≥3 symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), (2) ≥2 symptoms of LRTI, or (3) ≥2 symptoms of LRTI or ≥1 symptom of LRTI with ≥1 systemic symptom. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of approximately 200 participants. A total of 2891 participants in each study arm received study treatment. Vaccine efficacy was 80% (94.2% CI, 52.2-92.9%), 75% (50.1-88.5%), and 69.8% (43.7-84.7%) for case definition 1, 2, and 3, respectively (all P <0.001). In the vaccine arm, geometric mean fold increase in antibody titers 14 days after vaccination was 13.5 for RSV neutralizing antibodies and 8.6 for RSV prefusion F-specific binding antibodies, and median frequency of RSV-F-specific INFγ T-cells increased from 34 to 444 SFC/10

3.
Vaccine ; 39(22): 3081-3101, 2021 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-813888

RESUMEN

Replication-incompetent adenoviral vectors have been under investigation as a platform to carry a variety of transgenes, and express them as a basis for vaccine development. A replication-incompetent adenoviral vector based on human adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) has been evaluated in several clinical trials. The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) was formed to evaluate the safety and features of recombinant viral vector vaccines. This paper reviews features of the Ad26 vectors, including tabulation of safety and risk assessment characteristics of Ad26-based vaccines. In the Ad26 vector, deletion of E1 gene rendering the vector replication incompetent is combined with additional genetic engineering for vaccine manufacturability and transgene expression optimization. These vaccines can be manufactured in mammalian cell lines at scale providing an effective, flexible system for high-yield manufacturing. Ad26 vector vaccines have favorable thermostability profiles, compatible with vaccine supply chains. Safety data are compiled in the Ad26 vaccine safety database version 4.0, with unblinded data from 23 ongoing and completed clinical studies for 3912 participants in five different Ad26-based vaccine programs. Overall, Ad26-based vaccines have been well tolerated, with no significant safety issues identified. Evaluation of Ad26-based vaccines is continuing, with >114,000 participants vaccinated as of 4th September 2020. Extensive evaluation of immunogenicity in humans shows strong, durable humoral and cellular immune responses. Clinical trials have not revealed impact of pre-existing immunity to Ad26 on vaccine immunogenicity, even in the presence of Ad26 neutralizing antibody titers or Ad26-targeting T cell responses at baseline. The first Ad26-based vaccine, against Ebola virus, received marketing authorization from EC on 1st July 2020, as part of the Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen. New developments based on Ad26 vectors are underway, including a COVID-19 vaccine, which is currently in phase 3 of clinical evaluation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ebolavirus , Vacunas Virales , Animales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vectores Genéticos , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas Virales/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA